|
NAME | SYNOPSIS | DESCRIPTION | CONFORMING TO | NOTES | BUGS | SEE ALSO | COLOPHON |
|
VFORK(2) Linux Programmer's Manual VFORK(2)
vfork - create a child process and block parent
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
pid_t vfork(void);
Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
vfork():
Since glibc 2.12:
(_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500) && ! (_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L)
|| /* Since glibc 2.19: */ _DEFAULT_SOURCE
|| /* Glibc versions <= 2.19: */ _BSD_SOURCE
Before glibc 2.12:
_BSD_SOURCE || _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500
Standard description
(From POSIX.1) The vfork() function has the same effect as fork(2),
except that the behavior is undefined if the process created by
vfork() either modifies any data other than a variable of type pid_t
used to store the return value from vfork(), or returns from the
function in which vfork() was called, or calls any other function
before successfully calling _exit(2) or one of the exec(3) family of
functions.
Linux description
vfork(), just like fork(2), creates a child process of the calling
process. For details and return value and errors, see fork(2).
vfork() is a special case of clone(2). It is used to create new
processes without copying the page tables of the parent process. It
may be useful in performance-sensitive applications where a child is
created which then immediately issues an execve(2).
vfork() differs from fork(2) in that the calling thread is suspended
until the child terminates (either normally, by calling _exit(2), or
abnormally, after delivery of a fatal signal), or it makes a call to
execve(2). Until that point, the child shares all memory with its
parent, including the stack. The child must not return from the
current function or call exit(3) (which would have the effect of
calling exit handlers established by the parent process and flushing
the parent's stdio(3) buffers), but may call _exit(2).
As with fork(2), the child process created by vfork() inherits copies
of various of the caller's process attributes (e.g., file
descriptors, signal dispositions, and current working directory); the
vfork() call differs only in the treatment of the virtual address
space, as described above.
Signals sent to the parent arrive after the child releases the
parent's memory (i.e., after the child terminates or calls
execve(2)).
Historic description
Under Linux, fork(2) is implemented using copy-on-write pages, so the
only penalty incurred by fork(2) is the time and memory required to
duplicate the parent's page tables, and to create a unique task
structure for the child. However, in the bad old days a fork(2)
would require making a complete copy of the caller's data space,
often needlessly, since usually immediately afterward an exec(3) is
done. Thus, for greater efficiency, BSD introduced the vfork()
system call, which did not fully copy the address space of the parent
process, but borrowed the parent's memory and thread of control until
a call to execve(2) or an exit occurred. The parent process was
suspended while the child was using its resources. The use of
vfork() was tricky: for example, not modifying data in the parent
process depended on knowing which variables were held in a register.
4.3BSD; POSIX.1-2001 (but marked OBSOLETE). POSIX.1-2008 removes the
specification of vfork().
The requirements put on vfork() by the standards are weaker than
those put on fork(2), so an implementation where the two are
synonymous is compliant. In particular, the programmer cannot rely
on the parent remaining blocked until the child either terminates or
calls execve(2), and cannot rely on any specific behavior with
respect to shared memory.
Some consider the semantics of vfork() to be an architectural
blemish, and the 4.2BSD man page stated: "This system call will be
eliminated when proper system sharing mechanisms are implemented.
Users should not depend on the memory sharing semantics of vfork() as
it will, in that case, be made synonymous to fork(2)." However, even
though modern memory management hardware has decreased the
performance difference between fork(2) and vfork(), there are various
reasons why Linux and other systems have retained vfork():
* Some performance-critical applications require the small
performance advantage conferred by vfork().
* vfork() can be implemented on systems that lack a memory-
management unit (MMU), but fork(2) can't be implemented on such
systems. (POSIX.1-2008 removed vfork() from the standard; the
POSIX rationale for the posix_spawn(3) function notes that that
function, which provides functionality equivalent to
fork(2)+exec(3), is designed to be implementable on systems that
lack an MMU.)
* On systems where memory is constrained, vfork() avoids the need to
temporarily commit memory (see the description of
/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory in proc(5)) in order to execute a
new program. (This can be especially beneficial where a large
parent process wishes to execute a small helper program in a child
process.) By contrast, using fork(2) in this scenario requires
either committing an amount of memory equal to the size of the
parent process (if strict overcommitting is in force) or
overcommitting memory with the risk that a process is terminated
by the out-of-memory (OOM) killer.
Caveats
The child process should take care not to modify the memory in
unintended ways, since such changes will be seen by the parent
process once the child terminates or executes another program. In
this regard, signal handlers can be especially problematic: if a
signal handler that is invoked in the child of vfork() changes
memory, those changes may result in an inconsistent process state
from the perspective of the parent process (e.g., memory changes
would be visible in the parent, but changes to the state of open file
descriptors would not be visible).
When vfork() is called in a multithreaded process, only the calling
thread is suspended until the child terminates or executes a new
program. This means that the child is sharing an address space with
other running code. This can be dangerous if another thread in the
parent process changes credentials (using setuid(2) or similar),
since there are now two processes with different privilege levels
running in the same address space. As an example of the dangers,
suppose that a multithreaded program running as root creates a child
using vfork(). After the vfork(), a thread in the parent process
drops the process to an unprivileged user in order to run some
untrusted code (e.g., perhaps via plug-in opened with dlopen(3)). In
this case, attacks are possible where the parent process uses mmap(2)
to map in code that will be executed by the privileged child process.
Linux notes
Fork handlers established using pthread_atfork(3) are not called when
a multithreaded program employing the NPTL threading library calls
vfork(). Fork handlers are called in this case in a program using
the LinuxThreads threading library. (See pthreads(7) for a
description of Linux threading libraries.)
A call to vfork() is equivalent to calling clone(2) with flags
specified as:
CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK | SIGCHLD
History
The vfork() system call appeared in 3.0BSD. In 4.4BSD it was made
synonymous to fork(2) but NetBSD introduced it again; see
⟨http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/kernel/vfork.html⟩. In Linux, it
has been equivalent to fork(2) until 2.2.0-pre6 or so. Since
2.2.0-pre9 (on i386, somewhat later on other architectures) it is an
independent system call. Support was added in glibc 2.0.112.
Details of the signal handling are obscure and differ between
systems. The BSD man page states: "To avoid a possible deadlock
situation, processes that are children in the middle of a vfork() are
never sent SIGTTOU or SIGTTIN signals; rather, output or ioctls are
allowed and input attempts result in an end-of-file indication."
clone(2), execve(2), _exit(2), fork(2), unshare(2), wait(2)
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A
description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the
latest version of this page, can be found at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
Linux 2017-09-15 VFORK(2)
Pages that refer to this page: strace(1), clone(2), fork(2), getpid(2), ptrace(2), setns(2), syscalls(2), unshare(2), posix_spawn(3), persistent-keyring(7), pid_namespaces(7), session-keyring(7), user-keyring(7), user-session-keyring(7)
Copyright and license for this manual page
|
HTML rendering created 2018-02-02 by Michael Kerrisk, author of The Linux Programming Interface, maintainer of the Linux man-pages project. For details of in-depth Linux/UNIX system programming training courses that I teach, look here. Hosting by jambit GmbH.
|
|