8 Statements [stmt.stmt]

8.1 Preamble [stmt.pre]

2
#
[Note 1: 
The compound-statement of a lambda-expression is not a substatement of the statement (if any) in which the lambda-expression lexically appears.
— end note]
3
#
A statement S1 encloses a statement S2 if
A statement S1 is enclosed by a statement S2 if S2 encloses S1.
4
#
The rules for conditions apply both to selection-statements ([stmt.select]) and to the for and while statements ([stmt.iter]).
A condition that is not an expression is a declaration ([dcl.dcl]).
The declarator shall not specify a function or an array.
The decl-specifier-seq shall not define a class or enumeration.
If the auto type-specifier appears in the decl-specifier-seq, the type of the identifier being declared is deduced from the initializer as described in [dcl.spec.auto].
5
#
The value of a condition that is an initialized declaration in a statement other than a switch statement is the value of the declared variable contextually converted to bool ([conv]).
If that conversion is ill-formed, the program is ill-formed.
The value of a condition that is an expression is the value of the expression, contextually converted to bool for statements other than switch; if that conversion is ill-formed, the program is ill-formed.
The value of the condition will be referred to as simply “the condition” where the usage is unambiguous.
6
#
If a condition can be syntactically resolved as either an expression or a declaration, it is interpreted as the latter.
7
#
In the decl-specifier-seq of a condition, each decl-specifier shall be either a type-specifier or constexpr.

8.2 Label [stmt.label]

1
#
A label can be added to a statement or used anywhere in a compound-statement.
The optional attribute-specifier-seq appertains to the label.
The only use of a label with an identifier is as the target of a goto.
No two labels in a function shall have the same identifier.
A label can be used in a goto statement before its introduction.
2
#
A labeled-statement whose label is a case or default label shall be enclosed by ([stmt.pre]) a switch statement ([stmt.switch]).
3
#
A control-flow-limited statement is a statement S for which:
  • (3.1)
    a case or default label appearing within S shall be associated with a switch statement ([stmt.switch]) within S, and
  • (3.2)
    a label declared in S shall only be referred to by a statement ([stmt.goto]) in S.

8.3 Expression statement [stmt.expr]

1
#
Expression statements have the form
The expression is a discarded-value expression ([expr.context]).
All side effects from an expression statement are completed before the next statement is executed.
An expression statement with the expression missing is called a null statement.
[Note 1: 
Most statements are expression statements — usually assignments or function calls.
A null statement is useful to supply a null body to an iteration statement such as a while statement ([stmt.while]).
— end note]

8.4 Compound statement or block [stmt.block]

1
#
A compound statement (also known as a block) groups a sequence of statements into a single statement.
A label at the end of a compound-statement is treated as if it were followed by a null statement.
2
#
[Note 1: 
A compound statement defines a block scope ([basic.scope]).
A declaration is a statement ([stmt.dcl]).
— end note]

8.5 Selection statements [stmt.select]

8.5.1 General [stmt.select.general]

1
#
Selection statements choose one of several flows of control.
selection-statement:
if constexpr ( init-statement condition ) statement
if constexpr ( init-statement condition ) statement else statement
if ! consteval compound-statement
if ! consteval compound-statement else statement
switch ( init-statement condition ) statement
See [dcl.meaning] for the optional attribute-specifier-seq in a condition.
[Note 1: 
An init-statement ends with a semicolon.
— end note]
2
#
[Note 2: 
Each selection-statement and each substatement of a selection-statement has a block scope ([basic.scope.block]).
— end note]

8.5.2 The if statement [stmt.if]

1
#
If the condition ([stmt.pre]) yields true the first substatement is executed.
If the else part of the selection statement is present and the condition yields false, the second substatement is executed.
If the first substatement is reached via a label, the condition is not evaluated and the second substatement is not executed.
In the second form of if statement (the one including else), if the first substatement is also an if statement then that inner if statement shall contain an else part.76
2
#
If the if statement is of the form if constexpr, the value of the condition is contextually converted to bool and the converted expression shall be a constant expression ([expr.const]); this form is called a constexpr if statement.
If the value of the converted condition is false, the first substatement is a discarded statement, otherwise the second substatement, if present, is a discarded statement.
During the instantiation of an enclosing templated entity ([temp.pre]), if the condition is not value-dependent after its instantiation, the discarded substatement (if any) is not instantiated.
Each substatement of a constexpr if statement is a control-flow-limited statement ([stmt.label]).
[Example 1: if constexpr (sizeof(int[2])) {} // OK, narrowing allowed — end example]
[Note 1: 
Odr-uses ([basic.def.odr]) in a discarded statement do not require an entity to be defined.
— end note]
[Example 2: template<typename T, typename ... Rest> void g(T&& p, Rest&& ...rs) { // ... handle p if constexpr (sizeof...(rs) > 0) g(rs...); // never instantiated with an empty argument list } extern int x; // no definition of x required int f() { if constexpr (true) return 0; else if (x) return x; else return -x; } — end example]
3
#
An if statement of the form
if constexpr ( init-statement condition ) statement
is equivalent to
{
   init-statement
   if constexpr ( condition ) statement
}
and an if statement of the form
if constexpr ( init-statement condition ) statement else statement
is equivalent to
{
   init-statement
   if constexpr ( condition ) statement else statement
}
except that the init-statement is in the same scope as the condition.
4
#
An if statement of the form if consteval is called a consteval if statement.
The statement, if any, in a consteval if statement shall be a compound-statement.
[Example 3: constexpr void f(bool b) { if (true) if consteval { } else ; // error: not a compound-statement; else not associated with outer if } — end example]
5
#
If a consteval if statement is evaluated in a context that is manifestly constant-evaluated ([expr.const]), the first substatement is executed.
[Note 2: 
The first substatement is an immediate function context.
— end note]
Otherwise, if the else part of the selection statement is present, then the second substatement is executed.
Each substatement of a consteval if statement is a control-flow-limited statement ([stmt.label]).
6
#
An if statement of the form
if ! consteval compound-statement
is not itself a consteval if statement, but is equivalent to the consteval if statement
if consteval { } else compound-statement
An if statement of the form
if ! consteval compound-statement else statement
is not itself a consteval if statement, but is equivalent to the consteval if statement
if consteval statement else compound-statement
76)76)
In other words, the else is associated with the nearest un-elsed if.

8.5.3 The switch statement [stmt.switch]

1
#
The switch statement causes control to be transferred to one of several statements depending on the value of a condition.
2
#
The value of a condition that is an initialized declaration is the value of the declared variable, or the value of the expression otherwise.
The value of the condition shall be of integral type, enumeration type, or class type.
If of class type, the condition is contextually implicitly converted ([conv]) to an integral or enumeration type.
If the (possibly converted) type is subject to integral promotions ([conv.prom]), the condition is converted to the promoted type.
Any statement within the switch statement can be labeled with one or more case labels as follows:
case constant-expression :
where the constant-expression shall be a converted constant expression ([expr.const]) of the adjusted type of the switch condition.
No two of the case constants in the same switch shall have the same value after conversion.
3
#
There shall be at most one label of the form default : within a switch statement.
4
#
Switch statements can be nested; a case or default label is associated with the smallest switch enclosing it.
5
#
When the switch statement is executed, its condition is evaluated.
If one of the case constants has the same value as the condition, control is passed to the statement following the matched case label.
If no case constant matches the condition, and if there is a default label, control passes to the statement labeled by the default label.
If no case matches and if there is no default then none of the statements in the switch is executed.
6
#
case and default labels in themselves do not alter the flow of control, which continues unimpeded across such labels.
To exit from a switch, see break, [stmt.break].
[Note 1: 
Usually, the substatement that is the subject of a switch is compound and case and default labels appear on the top-level statements contained within the (compound) substatement, but this is not required.
Declarations can appear in the substatement of a switch statement.
— end note]
7
#
A switch statement of the form
switch ( init-statement condition ) statement
is equivalent to
{
   init-statement
   switch ( condition ) statement
}
except that the init-statement is in the same scope as the condition.

8.6 Iteration statements [stmt.iter]

8.6.1 General [stmt.iter.general]

2
#
The substatement in an iteration-statement implicitly defines a block scope ([basic.scope]) which is entered and exited each time through the loop.
If the substatement in an iteration-statement is a single statement and not a compound-statement, it is as if it was rewritten to be a compound-statement containing the original statement.
[Example 1: 
while (--x >= 0) int i; can be equivalently rewritten as while (--x >= 0) { int i; }
Thus after the while statement, i is no longer in scope.
— end example]

8.6.2 The while statement [stmt.while]

1
#
In the while statement the substatement is executed repeatedly until the value of the condition ([stmt.pre]) becomes false.
The test takes place before each execution of the substatement.
2
#
A while statement is equivalent to
label :
{
   if ( condition ) {
      statement
      goto label ;
   }
}
[Note 1: 
The variable created in the condition is destroyed and created with each iteration of the loop.
[Example 1: struct A { int val; A(int i) : val(i) { } ~A() { } operator bool() { return val != 0; } }; int i = 1; while (A a = i) { // ... i = 0; }
In the while-loop, the constructor and destructor are each called twice, once for the condition that succeeds and once for the condition that fails.
— end example]
— end note]

8.6.3 The do statement [stmt.do]

1
#
The expression is contextually converted to bool ([conv]); if that conversion is ill-formed, the program is ill-formed.
2
#
In the do statement the substatement is executed repeatedly until the value of the expression becomes false.
The test takes place after each execution of the statement.

8.6.4 The for statement [stmt.for]

1
#
The for statement
for ( init-statement condition ; expression ) statement
is equivalent to
{
   init-statement
   while ( condition ) {
      statement
      expression ;
   }
}
except that the init-statement is in the same scope as the condition, and except that a continue in statement (not enclosed in another iteration statement) will execute expression before re-evaluating condition.
[Note 1: 
Thus the first statement specifies initialization for the loop; the condition ([stmt.pre]) specifies a test, sequenced before each iteration, such that the loop is exited when the condition becomes false; the expression often specifies incrementing that is sequenced after each iteration.
— end note]
2
#
Either or both of the condition and the expression can be omitted.
A missing condition makes the implied while clause equivalent to while(true).

8.6.5 The range-based for statement [stmt.ranged]

1
#
The range-based for statement
for ( init-statement for-range-declaration : for-range-initializer ) statement
is equivalent to
{
   init-statement
   auto &&range = for-range-initializer ;
   auto begin = begin-expr ;
   auto end = end-expr ;
   for ( ; begin != end; ++begin ) {
      for-range-declaration = * begin ;
      statement
   }
}
where
  • (1.1)
    if the for-range-initializer is an expression, it is regarded as if it were surrounded by parentheses (so that a comma operator cannot be reinterpreted as delimiting two init-declarators);
  • (1.2)
    range, begin, and end are variables defined for exposition only; and
  • (1.3)
    begin-expr and end-expr are determined as follows:
    • (1.3.1)
      if the for-range-initializer is an expression of array type R, begin-expr and end-expr are range and range + N, respectively, where N is the array bound.
      If R is an array of unknown bound or an array of incomplete type, the program is ill-formed;
    • (1.3.2)
      if the for-range-initializer is an expression of class type C, and searches in the scope of C ([class.member.lookup]) for the names begin and end each find at least one declaration, begin-expr and end-expr are range.begin() and range.end(), respectively;
    • (1.3.3)
      otherwise, begin-expr and end-expr are begin(range) and end(range), respectively, where begin and end undergo argument-dependent lookup ([basic.lookup.argdep]).
      [Note 1: 
      Ordinary unqualified lookup ([basic.lookup.unqual]) is not performed.
      — end note]
[Example 1: int array[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; for (int& x : array) x *= 2; — end example]
[Note 2: 
The lifetime of some temporaries in the for-range-initializer is extended to cover the entire loop ([class.temporary]).
— end note]
[Example 2: using T = std::list<int>; const T& f1(const T& t) { return t; } const T& f2(T t) { return t; } T g(); void foo() { for (auto e : f1(g())) {} // OK, lifetime of return value of g() extended for (auto e : f2(g())) {} // undefined behavior } — end example]
2
#
In the decl-specifier-seq of a for-range-declaration, each decl-specifier shall be either a type-specifier or constexpr.
The decl-specifier-seq shall not define a class or enumeration.

8.7 Jump statements [stmt.jump]

8.7.1 General [stmt.jump.general]

1
#
Jump statements unconditionally transfer control.
2
#
[Note 1: 
On exit from a scope (however accomplished), objects with automatic storage duration ([basic.stc.auto]) that have been constructed in that scope are destroyed in the reverse order of their construction.
For temporaries, see [class.temporary].
However, the program can be terminated (by calling std​::​exit() or std​::​abort() ([support.start.term]), for example) without destroying objects with automatic storage duration.
— end note]
[Note 2: 
A suspension of a coroutine ([expr.await]) is not considered to be an exit from a scope.
— end note]

8.7.2 The break statement [stmt.break]

1
#
A break statement shall be enclosed by ([stmt.pre]) an iteration-statement ([stmt.iter]) or a switch statement ([stmt.switch]).
The break statement causes termination of the smallest such enclosing statement; control passes to the statement following the terminated statement, if any.

8.7.3 The continue statement [stmt.cont]

1
#
A continue statement shall be enclosed by ([stmt.pre]) an iteration-statement ([stmt.iter]).
The continue statement causes control to pass to the loop-continuation portion of the smallest such enclosing statement, that is, to the end of the loop.
More precisely, in each of the statements
while (foo) { { // ... } contin: ; }
do { { // ... } contin: ; } while (foo);
for (;;) { { // ... } contin: ; }
a continue not contained in an enclosed iteration statement is equivalent to goto contin.

8.7.4 The return statement [stmt.return]

1
#
A function returns control to its caller by the return statement.
2
#
The expr-or-braced-init-list of a return statement is called its operand.
A return statement with no operand shall be used only in a function whose return type is cv void, a constructor ([class.ctor]), or a destructor ([class.dtor]).
A return statement with an operand of type void shall be used only in a function that has a cv void return type.
A return statement with any other operand shall be used only in a function that has a return type other than cv void; the return statement initializes the returned reference or prvalue result object of the (explicit or implicit) function call by copy-initialization ([dcl.init]) from the operand.
[Note 1: 
A constructor or destructor does not have a return type.
— end note]
[Note 2: 
A return statement can involve an invocation of a constructor to perform a copy or move of the operand if it is not a prvalue or if its type differs from the return type of the function.
A copy operation associated with a return statement can be elided or converted to a move operation if an automatic storage duration variable is returned ([class.copy.elision]).
— end note]
3
#
The destructor for the result object is potentially invoked ([class.dtor], [except.ctor]).
[Example 1: class A { ~A() {} }; A f() { return A(); } // error: destructor of A is private (even though it is never invoked) — end example]
4
#
Flowing off the end of a constructor, a destructor, or a non-coroutine function with a cv void return type is equivalent to a return with no operand.
Otherwise, flowing off the end of a function that is neither main ([basic.start.main]) nor a coroutine ([dcl.fct.def.coroutine]) results in undefined behavior.
5
#
The copy-initialization of the result of the call is sequenced before the destruction of temporaries at the end of the full-expression established by the operand of the return statement, which, in turn, is sequenced before the destruction of local variables ([stmt.jump]) of the block enclosing the return statement.

8.7.5 The co_return statement [stmt.return.coroutine]

1
#
A co_return statement transfers control to the caller or resumer of a coroutine ([dcl.fct.def.coroutine]).
A coroutine shall not enclose a return statement ([stmt.return]).
[Note 1: 
For this determination, it is irrelevant whether the return statement is enclosed by a discarded statement ([stmt.if]).
— end note]
2
#
The expr-or-braced-init-list of a co_return statement is called its operand.
Let p be an lvalue naming the coroutine promise object ([dcl.fct.def.coroutine]).
A co_return statement is equivalent to:
{ S; goto final-suspend; }
where final-suspend is the exposition-only label defined in [dcl.fct.def.coroutine] and S is defined as follows:
3
#
If a search for the name return_void in the scope of the promise type finds any declarations, flowing off the end of a coroutine's function-body is equivalent to a co_return with no operand; otherwise flowing off the end of a coroutine's function-body results in undefined behavior.

8.7.6 The goto statement [stmt.goto]

1
#
The goto statement unconditionally transfers control to the statement labeled by the identifier.
The identifier shall be a label ([stmt.label]) located in the current function.

8.8 Declaration statement [stmt.dcl]

1
#
A declaration statement introduces one or more new names into a block; it has the form
[Note 1: 
If an identifier introduced by a declaration was previously declared in an outer block, the outer declaration is hidden for the remainder of the block ([basic.lookup.unqual]), after which it resumes its force.
— end note]
2
#
A variable with automatic storage duration ([basic.stc.auto]) is active everywhere in the scope to which it belongs after its init-declarator.
Upon each transfer of control (including sequential execution of statements) within a function from point P to point Q, all variables with automatic storage duration that are active at P and not at Q are destroyed in the reverse order of their construction.
Then, all variables with automatic storage duration that are active at Q but not at P are initialized in declaration order; unless all such variables have vacuous initialization ([basic.life]), the transfer of control shall not be a jump.77
When a declaration-statement is executed, P and Q are the points immediately before and after it; when a function returns, Q is after its body.
[Example 1: void f() { // ... goto lx; // error: jump into scope of a // ... ly: X a = 1; // ... lx: goto ly; // OK, jump implies destructor call for a followed by // construction again immediately following label ly } — end example]
3
#
Dynamic initialization of a block variable with static storage duration ([basic.stc.static]) or thread storage duration ([basic.stc.thread]) is performed the first time control passes through its declaration; such a variable is considered initialized upon the completion of its initialization.
If the initialization exits by throwing an exception, the initialization is not complete, so it will be tried again the next time control enters the declaration.
If control enters the declaration concurrently while the variable is being initialized, the concurrent execution shall wait for completion of the initialization.
[Note 2: 
A conforming implementation cannot introduce any deadlock around execution of the initializer.
Deadlocks might still be caused by the program logic; the implementation need only avoid deadlocks due to its own synchronization operations.
— end note]
If control re-enters the declaration recursively while the variable is being initialized, the behavior is undefined.
[Example 2: int foo(int i) { static int s = foo(2*i); // undefined behavior: recursive call return i+1; } — end example]
4
#
An object associated with a block variable with static or thread storage duration will be destroyed if and only if it was constructed.
[Note 3: 
[basic.start.term] describes the order in which such objects are destroyed.
— end note]
77)77)
The transfer from the condition of a switch statement to a case label is considered a jump in this respect.

8.9 Ambiguity resolution [stmt.ambig]

1
#
There is an ambiguity in the grammar involving expression-statements and declarations: An expression-statement with a function-style explicit type conversion ([expr.type.conv]) as its leftmost subexpression can be indistinguishable from a declaration where the first declarator starts with a (.
In those cases the statement is considered a declaration, except as specified below.
2
#
[Note 1: 
If the statement cannot syntactically be a declaration, there is no ambiguity, so this rule does not apply.
In some cases, the whole statement needs to be examined to determine whether this is the case.
This resolves the meaning of many examples.
[Example 1: 
T(a)->m = 7; // expression-statement T(a)++; // expression-statement T(a,5)<<c; // expression-statement T(*d)(int); // declaration T(e)[5]; // declaration T(f) = { 1, 2 }; // declaration T(*g)(double(3)); // declaration
In the last example above, g, which is a pointer to T, is initialized to double(3).
This is of course ill-formed for semantic reasons, but that does not affect the syntactic analysis.
— end example]
The remaining cases are declarations.
[Example 2: class T { // ... public: T(); T(int); T(int, int); }; T(a); // declaration T(*b)(); // declaration T(c)=7; // declaration T(d),e,f=3; // declaration extern int h; T(g)(h,2); // declaration — end example]
— end note]
3
#
The disambiguation is purely syntactic; that is, the meaning of the names occurring in such a statement, beyond whether they are type-names or not, is not generally used in or changed by the disambiguation.
Class templates are instantiated as necessary to determine if a qualified name is a type-name.
Disambiguation precedes parsing, and a statement disambiguated as a declaration may be an ill-formed declaration.
If, during parsing, lookup finds that a name in a template argument is bound to (part of) the declaration being parsed, the program is ill-formed.
No diagnostic is required.
[Example 3: struct T1 { T1 operator()(int x) { return T1(x); } int operator=(int x) { return x; } T1(int) { } }; struct T2 { T2(int) { } }; int a, (*(*b)(T2))(int), c, d; void f() { // disambiguation requires this to be parsed as a declaration: T1(a) = 3, T2(4), // T2 will be declared as a variable of type T1, but this will not (*(*b)(T2(c)))(int(d)); // allow the last part of the declaration to parse properly, // since it depends on T2 being a type-name } — end example]
4
#
A syntactically ambiguous statement that can syntactically be a declaration with an outermost declarator with a trailing-return-type is considered a declaration only if it starts with auto.
[Example 4: struct M; struct S { S* operator()(); int N; int M; void mem(S s) { auto(s)()->M; // expression, S​::​M hides ​::​M } }; void f(S s) { { auto(s)()->N; // expression auto(s)()->M; // function declaration } { S(s)()->N; // expression S(s)()->M; // expression } } — end example]